Showing 681–690 of 1,164 reviews (4 star)
Course was informative and instructor was very knowledgeable.
Very good course. Useful and informative
The course is excellent, only one thing requires improvement. The course materials need to be provided to candidates at least one week before the start of the course to give candidates to go through them, as the course period is short.
Authorising Engineer is not the most riveting of topics but the course was made enjoyable and interesting by the personable approach of Steve Procopis. The venue, as always, is fit for purpose and well run. There were a few discrepancies in the course content provided and the content presented e.g. some parts missing. This meant that some of the answers in the written exam could not be found. I was given a digital copy of the correct information to take away instead of the hard copy (I have not verified the accuracy of the digital copy). This did not detract from the course experience. I have not rated Lee Hubbard (above) as Lee did not take part in delivering the course.
Wording for final competance assessment is very poor
the course was very informative, though a few more real life examples would aid understanding on how to approach fault level calculations and protection
A little too much PowerPoint for my liking and course handbook was missing sections that it should have had.