The Science of Learning reviews

4.8 (1,024 reviews)
AI summary of reviews

Research-backed teaching strategies are the course’s defining strength: attendees say it makes working memory, retrieval practice, questioning and feedback clear and relevant to classroom practice. They value the knowledgeable, enthusiastic trainers, whose warm, inclusive delivery uses experiments, quizzes, paired discussion and practical examples to keep sessions engaging and reflective. The well-structured, accessible content provides useful resources and takeaways that attendees feel ready to apply in lessons, while encouraging them to examine and refine existing practice.

Research-backed contentEngaging deliveryPractical strategies

Generated from recent reviews; may not reflect every review

Showing 91–100 of 1,033 reviews

Sort by
“

Very good course at the appropriate time. Helpful to help our Learners with long term memory acquisition

Francis I · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Brilliant

Tracie M · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Very good content . Would love some examples of subject specific lesson activities.

Soujanya T · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Just need time to be able to use what has been shown to us.

Hannah G · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

This is a topic I am working on at the moment. It was very helpful and clarified a few things.

Dee T · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Generally it was an interesting course, interesting things to learn.

Claudia A · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

It was a very useful course, with some fresh ideas to help the learners with their deeper thinking. I will definitely be trying some of these ideas especially multiple choice questions

Xara T · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Well-presented

Aysha G · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Thank you

Mimoza P · 28 Jan 2026
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review
“

Very informative

Noel M · 04 Dec 2025
Helpful review?YesNo
Report review