Showing 741–750 of 2,428 reviews (4 star)
Very engaging throughout, learning plenty of new information.
Trainer was fine, he made excuses about inclusion and disabilities to force us to have our cameras on and he had us go around at the end to say why the training was good which was weird
Is useful to elements for my role, but was fast paced and didn't allow time for clarification during the exercise.
The tutor / barrister was very good in a small discussion group and very happy to debate the issues the room wanted to debate - which makes for a good learning environment. I would have loved to have been on this course before finalising my EW report, as I think there are things I might have done slightly differently in that report and the joint statement had I done that. The most apparent learnings and benefits of the course though are in understanding and practicing how to best prepare and run the cross examination in court. I almost wonder whether the course should be split in that way ie 1. prep of the report / joint statement and things to think about, look out for, what will the barrister be looking for in the report to attack under cross examination etc... and 2. the cross examination itself. In my case those things are 6-7 months apart so that is a factor (but on day 2 we did the report as the last session and I thought maybe that should have been first?). An extremely helpful course though, and the mix in the room of restructuring and pensions was great.
informative, good discussions ,
I was expecting this course to be purely relevant to medical expert witness report writing. However, it was more general. It would be beneficial to deliver the course as two different courses, one for medical professionals only and the other for non-medical professions. This would help to go through examples and template reports with relevance to the profession.
Very good course and very informative. would recommend to others.