Showing 3,211–3,220 of 14,087 reviews
Really engaging trainer, all the stories and experience were highly relevant to the subject area
Richard was great. I love anecdotes to highlight content. He has a vast amount of experience as is still current and portrays love of the job. I got a supportive feeling from him.
A very interesting course. Background information useful. A lot of detail in a short time - very intense.
The variety of the break out rooms were helpful.
Need more clarity of the specialist courts within the King's Bench Division: • Administrative Court: Deals with administrative law cases, including those involving public authorities and public bodies. • Admiralty Court: Handles maritime law cases, such as disputes over shipping and maritime operations. • Commercial Court: Specializes in significant commercial disputes, many of which are international in nature. • Technology and Construction Court: Focuses on technology and construction-related disputes. • Circuit Commercial Courts: Enables business disputes brought anywhere in the country to be tried by judges with specialist commercial law expertise. Need to list minor / junior courts such as Ecclesiastical Court, Coroners Court, Youth Court. Need to address Remaining EU Law Act 2023 and the impact on English Law. Need to look at relevance of section 4.3. CPR 36 is a growing part of High Court KBD expert witness work. We need to add this to the course. Candidates need guidance as to where and when they have a role to play in Part 36 offers. It would be helpful to expand the section on duties and obligations of Expert Witness and Instructing Solicitors to cover non-payment by client, instructing solicitor and what happens if there is a breach of contract. Need to cover Expert Witness issued Request For Information. Need to cover Expert Witness Supplemental Reports written after a Joint Statement to address the areas of disagreement in more detail. Practice Direction 35 and 2014 Guidance are mute on Supplemental Reports
Jim was great, content was interesting and pace was about right.
A very well‑delivered course. It’s a difficult subject to keep people engaged with, but the delivery helped maintain interest throughout. For me personally, I feel that three 6‑hour days might have been better than two very long days, as it would have made the content easier to absorb