Showing 101–110 of 2,419 reviews (4 star)
This was a very clear and well delivered course.
Found it all very interesting but I think it was more aimed towards psu/investigations than from a vetting standpoint that’s my only comment but I think it could easily be made relevant for the vetting audience.
A lot of initial powerpoint but content useful and case studies provoked good discussion. Would like to have it expanded upon with specific agency input/processes
well worth attending some of the discussion/refresher was diluted by digressing from topic course like this should be regimented - start with concepts of liability (did but digressed), clarify CPR part 35, discuss basics of examination, basic structure of a personal injury report, mention some good / bad reports, dishonesty. Some participants were ill informed about their role as "expert". could have benefitted more if focussed.
I have learnt a lot more about the different legislations. It was a good mixture of interaction and learning from slides. This allowed a deeper understanding and to maintain concentration more easily. It was useful to have examples of good notices. Good amount of breaks. Some questions needed more time whilst others needed less e.g. less time writing notes about lunch break.
Very informative and educative in updating my knowledge.
A very informative course with the tutor relaying cases for relevance. Course size appeared a little too large and negated interaction from participants.