Sort by:

ISO/TS 16949 Appreciation and Interpretation Reviews

Showing 4 star reviews : View all 10 reviews

Fiona B, 14 Sep 2018

It was useful to work directly with the Standards within the course and look things up for ourselves - it made it relevant.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

ANTHONY W, 26 May 2017

Birmingham

Hazel L, 23 Feb 2017

London

Help me understand changes from ISO/TS16949:2009 to IATF 16949:2016 and how to interpret the standard

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Alison D, 21 Feb 2017

London

only lost stars as the course handouts were for a difference course. I consider a factor in this error may have been as the course was booked relatively last minute. Notes were promptly photocopied for each delegate and LRQA will forward the colour versions on after. Overall I was very pleased that LRQA had managed to set up this additional public training course at short notice.

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Angela H, 04 Apr 2016

Coventry

Didn't have much information about the course before taking part - joining instructions only came a couple of days before attendance, no map included, didn't know where I was going. It was local to home though which was good, although I didn't know it was going to be an LRQA run course before I attended, why wasn't it held a the new LRQA Birmingham offices, as we have training facilities there? I thought the course was going to deal more with the TS rules rather than the TS standard. Having said that he information provided was of a very good standard, and it has improved my knowledge of the subject

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]

Stephen H, 31 Mar 2016

Coventry

Hi A really insightful course which provided me with good information, relevant to my role. Steve Lees who ran the course was excellent and was very understanding of the TS knowledge held by the LRQA representatives and also external clients on the course. His personality and knowledge was perfect and kept the discussion interesting at all times providing stories of visits he had performed and issues that arose from them. Overall very worthwhile. Only concern is that we were sold the move to the new UK site in Birmingham on the understanding that, to cut future costs, courses like this would be held here in Birmingham. So not sure why it was held at Warwick University. Having known about the course since early November 2015, surely to reduce costs it could have been arranged to be held in Birmingham ? Regards Steve

Helpful review?   Yes   No

[ Inappropriate review ]